There's cross-talk on the RPi4 between the 2.4GHz channels used by the WiFi
chip and some resolutions, most notably 1440p at 60Hz.

In such a case, we can either reject entirely the mode, or lower slightly
the pixel frequency to remove the overlap. Let's go for the latter.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech>

---

Changes from v1:
  - Change the name of the property
  - Test for a range instead of an exact frequency
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
index 506c12454086..0d72e519aec4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
@@ -760,6 +760,9 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder 
*encoder)
 {
 }
 
+#define WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MIN_FREQ       2400000000ULL
+#define WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MAX_FREQ       2422000000ULL
+
 static int vc4_hdmi_encoder_atomic_check(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
                                         struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
                                         struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
@@ -767,12 +770,27 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_encoder_atomic_check(struct 
drm_encoder *encoder,
        struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
        struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = encoder_to_vc4_hdmi(encoder);
        unsigned long long pixel_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
+       unsigned long long tmds_rate;
 
        if (vc4_hdmi->variant->unsupported_odd_h_timings &&
            ((mode->hdisplay % 2) || (mode->hsync_start % 2) ||
             (mode->hsync_end % 2) || (mode->htotal % 2)))
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       /*
+        * The 1440p@60 pixel rate is in the same range than the first
+        * WiFi channel (between 2.4GHz and 2.422GHz with 22MHz
+        * bandwidth). Slightly lower the frequency to bring it out of
+        * the WiFi range.
+        */
+       tmds_rate = pixel_rate * 10;
+       if (vc4_hdmi->disable_wifi_frequencies &&
+           (tmds_rate >= WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MIN_FREQ &&
+            tmds_rate <= WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MAX_FREQ)) {
+               mode->clock = 238560;
+               pixel_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
+       }
+
        if (pixel_rate > vc4_hdmi->variant->max_pixel_clock)
                return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1717,6 +1735,9 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct 
device *master, void *data)
                vc4_hdmi->hpd_active_low = hpd_gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
        }
 
+       vc4_hdmi->disable_wifi_frequencies =
+               of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wifi-2.4ghz-coexistence");
+
        pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 
        drm_simple_encoder_init(drm, encoder, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h
index 6815e93b1a48..3843be830601 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h
@@ -142,6 +142,14 @@ struct vc4_hdmi {
        int hpd_gpio;
        bool hpd_active_low;
 
+       /*
+        * On some systems (like the RPi4), some modes are in the same
+        * frequency range than the WiFi channels (1440p@60Hz for
+        * example). Should we take evasive actions because that system
+        * has a wifi adapter.
+        */
+       bool disable_wifi_frequencies;
+
        struct cec_adapter *cec_adap;
        struct cec_msg cec_rx_msg;
        bool cec_tx_ok;
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to