Hi Yu Wang
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:18:59AM +0000, Xu Wang wrote:
> Because clk_disable_unprepare already checked NULL clock parameter,
> so the additional checks are unnecessary, just remove it
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vu...@iscas.ac.cn>
Thanks, applied to drm-misc-next. I will appear in linux-next in a few
weeks.
Sam
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 5b6e19ecbc84..1b01836f1eb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -819,8 +819,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge
> *bridge)
> {
> struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
>
> - if (pdata->refclk)
> - clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->refclk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->refclk);
>
> pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
