Hi Gwan-gyeong,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next 
next-20200507]
[cannot apply to tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next linus/master v5.7-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Gwan-gyeong-Mun/In-order-to-readout-DP-SDPs-refactors-the-handling-of-DP-SDPs/20200508-034404
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>

New smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:727 intel_psr_compute_config() warn: 
inconsistent indenting

Old smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:1564 intel_psr_short_pulse() error: 
uninitialized symbol 'error_status'.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:1569 intel_psr_short_pulse() error: 
uninitialized symbol 'error_status'.

vim +727 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c

   711  
   712  void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
   713                                struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
   714  {
   715          struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
   716          struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
   717          const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
   718                  &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
   719          int psr_setup_time;
   720  
   721          if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
   722                  return;
   723  
   724          if (intel_dp != dev_priv->psr.dp)
   725                  return;
   726  
 > 727           if (!psr_global_enabled(dev_priv))
   728                  return;
   729          /*
   730           * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
   731           * BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per 
transcoder but
   732           * for now it only supports one instance of PSR, so lets keep it
   733           * hardcoded to PORT_A
   734           */
   735          if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
   736                  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   737                              "PSR condition failed: Port not 
supported\n");
   738                  return;
   739          }
   740  
   741          if (dev_priv->psr.sink_not_reliable) {
   742                  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   743                              "PSR sink implementation is not 
reliable\n");
   744                  return;
   745          }
   746  
   747          if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
   748                  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   749                              "PSR condition failed: Interlaced mode 
enabled\n");
   750                  return;
   751          }
   752  
   753          psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
   754          if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
   755                  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   756                              "PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup 
time (0x%02x)\n",
   757                              intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
   758                  return;
   759          }
   760  
   761          if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time) >
   762              adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay - 
1) {
   763                  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
   764                              "PSR condition failed: PSR setup time (%d 
us) too long\n",
   765                              psr_setup_time);
   766                  return;
   767          }
   768  
   769          crtc_state->has_psr = true;
   770          crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp, 
crtc_state);
   771          crtc_state->infoframes.enable |= 
intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(DP_SDP_VSC);
   772  }
   773  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to