Hi Nirmoy,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next 
tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v5.7-rc3 
next-20200429]
[cannot apply to drm/drm-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nirmoy-Das/drm-mm-optimize-rb_hole_addr-rbtree-search-in-high-addr-mode/20200429-154950
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-191-gc51a0382-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:455:24: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL 
>> pointer

vim +455 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c

   431  
   432  /**
   433   * next_hole_high_addr - returns next hole for a DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH 
mode request
   434   * @entry: previously selected drm_mm_node
   435   * @size: size of the a hole needed for the request
   436   *
   437   * This function will verify whether left subtree of @entry has hole 
big enough
   438   * to fit the requtested size. If so, it will return previous node of 
@entry or
   439   * else it will return parent node of @entry
   440   *
   441   * It will also skip the complete left subtree if max_hole_size of that 
subtree
   442   * is same as the max_hole_size of the @entry.
   443   *
   444   * Returns:
   445   * previous node of @entry if left subtree of @entry can serve the 
request or
   446   * else return parent of @entry
   447   */
   448  static struct drm_mm_node *
   449  next_hole_high_addr(struct drm_mm_node *entry, u64 size)
   450  {
   451          struct rb_node *rb_node, *left_rb_node, *parent_rb_node;
   452          struct drm_mm_node *left_node;
   453  
   454          if (!entry)
 > 455                  return false;
   456  
   457          rb_node = &entry->rb_hole_addr;
   458          if (rb_node->rb_left) {
   459                  left_rb_node = rb_node->rb_left;
   460                  parent_rb_node = rb_parent(rb_node);
   461                  left_node = rb_entry(left_rb_node,
   462                                       struct drm_mm_node, rb_hole_addr);
   463                  if ((left_node->max_hole_size < size ||
   464                       entry->size == entry->max_hole_size) &&
   465                      parent_rb_node && parent_rb_node->rb_left != 
rb_node)
   466                          return rb_hole_addr_to_node(parent_rb_node);
   467          }
   468  
   469          return rb_hole_addr_to_node(rb_prev(rb_node));
   470  }
   471  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to