Maybe we could reduce the mutex_lock(&mem->lock)`s protected code area, and no need to protect pr_debug.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bern...@vivo.com> Changes since V1: *commit message improve Changes since V2: *move comment along with the mutex_unlock Changes since V3: *lock protect the if check, there is some possibility of multi-threaded racing modify. Link for V1: *https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1226588/ --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c index 327317c54f7c..549bdb429883 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c @@ -1289,9 +1289,9 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu( mutex_lock(&mem->lock); if (mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) { + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); pr_debug("BO VA 0x%llx size 0x%lx is still mapped.\n", mem->va, bo_size); - mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); return -EBUSY; } -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
