Although it's not unexpected for drm_dp_check_act_status() to fail due
to DPCD read failures (as the hub may have just been unplugged
suddenly), timeouts are a bit more worrying as they either mean we need
a longer timeout value, or we aren't setting up payload allocations
properly. So, let's start printing errors on timeouts.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
Cc: Sean Paul <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index f313407374ed..3d0d373f6f91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -4494,6 +4494,10 @@ int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
                                        DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS,
                                        &status);
                if (ret < 0) {
+                       /*
+                        * Failure here isn't unexpected - the hub may have
+                        * just been unplugged
+                        */
                        DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to read payload table status 
%d\n",
                                      ret);
                        return ret;
@@ -4505,8 +4509,8 @@ int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
        } while (jiffies < timeout);
 
        if (!(status & DP_PAYLOAD_ACT_HANDLED)) {
-               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ACT bit %d after %dms\n",
-                             status, timeout_ms);
+               DRM_ERROR("Failed to get ACT after %dms, last status: %02x\n",
+                         timeout_ms, status);
                return -EINVAL;
        }
        return 0;
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to