On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 22:34 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently > listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh. > > Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is > correct?
This display (a controller is included) has a wide tolerance range. Adapting clock should be fine while keeping vrefresh rate at 60 Hz. I guess an even better alternative would be to change this config to a pixelclock describing one like the other auo panels. But at the moment I'm not having a display here. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel