Hi,

On 11/12/2012 03:00 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
move to release_list instead

Can you describe why this change is made? cleanup? reorder locks in a later patch? Also please describe why you need move_notify and ttm unbind / destroy to be outside of reservation, because that's the main change in this patch and it's not even mentioned in the
commit message.

Thanks,
Thomas



Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 47 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 9c48e8f..74d6e7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -143,12 +143,20 @@ static void ttm_bo_release_list(struct kref *list_kref)
        BUG_ON(atomic_read(&bo->kref.refcount));
        BUG_ON(atomic_read(&bo->cpu_writers));
        BUG_ON(bo->sync_obj != NULL);
-       BUG_ON(bo->mem.mm_node != NULL);
        BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->lru));
        BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy));
- if (bo->ttm)
+       if (bo->bdev->driver->move_notify)
+               bo->bdev->driver->move_notify(bo, NULL);
+
+       if (bo->ttm) {
+               ttm_tt_unbind(bo->ttm);
                ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
+               bo->ttm = NULL;
+       }
+       ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, &bo->mem);
+       BUG_ON(bo->mem.mm_node != NULL);
+
        atomic_dec(&bo->glob->bo_count);
        if (bo->destroy)
                bo->destroy(bo);
@@ -466,35 +474,6 @@ out_err:
        return ret;
  }
-/**
- * Call bo::reserved.
- * Will release GPU memory type usage on destruction.
- * This is the place to put in driver specific hooks to release
- * driver private resources.
- * Will release the bo::reserved lock.
- */
-
-static void ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
-{
-       if (bo->bdev->driver->move_notify)
-               bo->bdev->driver->move_notify(bo, NULL);
-
-       if (bo->ttm) {
-               ttm_tt_unbind(bo->ttm);
-               ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
-               bo->ttm = NULL;
-       }
-       ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, &bo->mem);
-
-       atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
-
-       /*
-        * Make processes trying to reserve really pick it up.
-        */
-       smp_mb__after_atomic_dec();
-       wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
-}
-
  static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
  {
        struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
@@ -523,8 +502,9 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct 
ttm_buffer_object *bo)
                spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
                put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
+ atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+               wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
                spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-               ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
ttm_bo_list_ref_sub(bo, put_count, true); @@ -619,8 +599,9 @@ retry_reserve:
        list_del_init(&bo->ddestroy);
        ++put_count;
+ atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+       wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
        spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-       ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
ttm_bo_list_ref_sub(bo, put_count, true);

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to