On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:18 PM Gurchetan Singh
<gurchetansi...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:49 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 06:49:35PM -0700, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> > > This doesn't really break userspace, since it always passes down
> > > 0 for stride/layer_stride currently. We could:
> > >
> > > (1) modify UAPI now and add a VIRTGPU_PARAM_STRIDE_FIX feature
> >
> > This I think.
> > But IMO it's not a fix, it is an added feature ...
> >
> > Also missing the big picture here. Why do we need this?
>
> Two reasons:
I don't fully get the picture, but drm_virtgpu_resource_create has
stride. Can we send that down in transfers? It lacks layer_stride
though...
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
