Hi Laurent,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:31:05PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > +   if (mipi_dsi_packet_format_is_short(msg->type)) {
> > +           u16 data = packet.header[1] | (packet.header[2] << 8);
> > +           r = dsi_vc_send_short(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type, data, 0);
> 
> You use the packet for this case only, I think you could simply write
> 
>               u16 data = ((msg->tx_len > 0) ? tx[0] : 0)
>                        | (((msg->tx_len > 1) ? tx[1] : 0) << 8);
>               r = dsi_vc_send_short(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type, data, 0);

That probably works with 's/tx[/((u8*) msg->tx_buf)[', which looks
really ugly :) This code is further simplified by a further patch,
which forwards the complete message into dsi_vc_send_short().

> >     } else {
> > -           r = dsi_vc_send_long(dsi, channel,
> > -                           type == DSS_DSI_CONTENT_GENERIC ?
> > -                           MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_LONG_WRITE :
> > -                           MIPI_DSI_DCS_LONG_WRITE, data, len, 0);
> > +           r = dsi_vc_send_long(dsi, msg->channel, msg->type,
> > +                                              msg->tx_buf, msg->tx_len, 0);
> 
> Indentation.

Ok.

> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>

Are you fine with keeping the mipi_dsi_packet, since it will be
removed in a further patch?

> >     }
> >  
> > -   return r;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int dsi_vc_dcs_write_nosync(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, int 
> > channel,
> > -           const u8 *data, int len)
> > -{
> > -   struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev);
> > -
> > -   return dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len,
> > -                   DSS_DSI_CONTENT_DCS);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int dsi_vc_generic_write_nosync(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev, int 
> > channel,
> > -           const u8 *data, int len)
> > -{
> > -   struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev);
> > -
> > -   return dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len,
> > -                   DSS_DSI_CONTENT_GENERIC);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int dsi_vc_write_common(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev,
> > -                          int channel, const u8 *data, int len,
> > -                          enum dss_dsi_content_type type)
> > -{
> > -   struct dsi_data *dsi = to_dsi_data(dssdev);
> > -   int r;
> > +   if (r < 0)
> > +           return r;
> >  
> > -   r = dsi_vc_write_nosync_common(dsi, channel, data, len, type);
> > -   if (r)
> > -           goto err;
> > +   /*
> > +    * we do not always have to do the BTA sync, for example we can
> > +    * improve performance by setting the update window information
> > +    * without sending BTA sync between the commands. In that case
> > +    * we can return earily.
> 
> s/earily/early/
> 
> Do I understand correctly that this isn't implemented yet ? You should
> make it clear in the comment that it's a candidate for a future
> optimization.

Yes. I forgot the TODO keyword for some reason. Has been quite some
time since I wrote this patch :) I fixed the earily and prefixed the
message with TODO.

-- Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to