Quoting Pankaj Bharadiya (2020-02-25 13:47:00) > Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct > drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so > that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace. > > i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE, > wherever possible.
Whatever for? MISSING_CASE() itself should be a complete picture for the forgotten code. -Chris _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
