From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
After much head scratching I managed to convince myself that
for_each_displayid_db() has already done the bounds checks for
the DispID CEA data block. Which is why we don't need to repeat
them in cea_db_offsets(). To avoid having to go through that
pain again in the future add a comment which explains this fact.
Cc: Andres Rodriguez <andre...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index 3df5744026b0..0369a54e3d32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -4001,6 +4001,10 @@ cea_db_offsets(const u8 *cea, int *start, int *end)
* no non-DTD data.
*/
if (cea[0] == DATA_BLOCK_CTA) {
+ /*
+ * for_each_displayid_db() has already verified
+ * that these stay within expected bounds.
+ */
*start = 3;
*end = *start + cea[2];
} else if (cea[0] == CEA_EXT) {
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
