On 2020-01-06 10:24, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 02.01.2020 11:08, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>>> From: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se>
>>>
>>> The intention was to only select a higher pixel-clock rate than the
>>> requested, if a slight overclocking would result in a rate significantly
>>> closer to the requested rate than if the conservative lower pixel-clock
>>> rate is selected. The fixed patch has the logic the other way around and
>>> actually prefers the higher frequency. Fix that.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f6f7ad323461 ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock
>>> than requested")
>> The id is wrong here - the right one is:
>> 9946a3a9dbedaaacef8b7e94f6ac144f1daaf1de
>
> Right! Sorry for this one! Thank you for fixing it up.
Dito. This one was my fault. I wonder how I came up with the wrong id?
Probably some backport branch or something, but I'm not finding it. Oh
well, sorry again.
Cheers,
Peter
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
