Hi Mihail.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:16:26PM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <mihail.atanas...@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c
> index 68289b0b063a..20a3956b33bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c
> @@ -462,9 +462,7 @@ static int sti_dvo_bind(struct device *dev, struct device
> *master, void *data)
> if (!bridge)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - bridge->driver_private = dvo;
> - bridge->funcs = &sti_dvo_bridge_funcs;
> - bridge->of_node = dvo->dev.of_node;
> + drm_bridge_init(bridge, &dvo->dev, &sti_dvo_bridge_funcs, NULL, dvo);
> drm_bridge_add(bridge);
>
> err = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge, NULL);
I can see from grepping that bridge.driver_private is used
in a couple of other files in sti/
Like sti_hdmi.c:
bridge->driver_private = hdmi;
bridge->funcs = &sti_hdmi_bridge_funcs;
drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge, NULL);
I wonder if a drm_bridge_init() should be added there.
I did not look closely - but it looked suspisiously.
Sam
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
