On Friday 28 September 2012 01:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 28-09-12 09:29, Rob Clark schreef:
From: Rob Clark <r...@ti.com>
We never really clarified if unmap could be done in atomic context.
But since mapping might require sleeping, this implies mutex in use
to synchronize mapping/unmapping, so unmap could sleep as well.  Add
a might_sleep() to clarify this.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <r...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
  drivers/base/dma-buf.c |    2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
index c30f3e1..877eacb 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment 
*attach,
                                struct sg_table *sg_table,
                                enum dma_data_direction direction)
  {
+       might_sleep();
+
        if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
                return;

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com>
Thanks Rob,

Applied to for-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to