On 9/17/19 8:24 PM, Simon Ser wrote:
> Currently the property docs don't specify whether it's okay for two planes to
> have the same zpos value and what user-space should expect in this case.
> 
> The rule mentionned in the past was to disambiguate with object IDs. However
> some drivers break this rule (that's why the ordering is documented as
> unspecified in case the zpos property is missing). Additionally it doesn't
> really make sense for a driver to user identical zpos values if it knows their
> relative position: the driver can just pick different values instead.
> 
> So two solutions would make sense: either disallow completely identical zpos
> values for two different planes, either make the ordering unspecified. To 
> allow
> drivers that don't know the relative ordering between two planes to still
> expose the zpos property, choose the latter solution.
> 
> Additionally, update the drm_plane_state.zpos docs to clarify that zpos
> disambiguation via plane object IDs is a recommendation for drivers, not
> something user-space can rely on.
> 
> v2: clarify drm_plane_state.zpos docs (Daniel)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr>
> Cc: Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Marius Vlad <marius.v...@collabora.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c | 8 ++++----
>  include/drm/drm_plane.h     | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> index d02709dd2d4a..51bd5454e50a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.c
> @@ -132,10 +132,10 @@
>   *   planes. Without this property the primary plane is always below the 
> cursor
>   *   plane, and ordering between all other planes is undefined. The positive
>   *   Z axis points towards the user, i.e. planes with lower Z position values
> - *   are underneath planes with higher Z position values. Note that the Z
> - *   position value can also be immutable, to inform userspace about the
> - *   hard-coded stacking of overlay planes, see
> - *   drm_plane_create_zpos_immutable_property().
> + *   are underneath planes with higher Z position values. Two planes with the
> + *   same Z position value have undefined ordering. Note that the Z position
> + *   value can also be immutable, to inform userspace about the hard-coded
> + *   stacking of overlay planes, see 
> drm_plane_create_zpos_immutable_property().

stacking of overlay (and or) scanout planes?


>   *
>   * pixel blend mode:
>   *   Pixel blend mode is set up with drm_plane_create_blend_mode_property().
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_plane.h b/include/drm/drm_plane.h
> index cd5903ad33f7..7ac68057b19d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_plane.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_plane.h
> @@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ struct drm_plane_state {
>        * Priority of the given plane on crtc (optional).
>        *
>        * Note that multiple active planes on the same crtc can have an
> -      * identical zpos value. The rule to solving the conflict is to compare
> -      * the plane object IDs; the plane with a higher ID must be stacked on
> -      * top of a plane with a lower ID.
> +      * identical zpos value. To solve the conflict, the recommendation to
> +      * drivers to avoid surprises is to compare the plane object IDs; the
> +      * plane with a higher ID is stacked on top of a plane with a lower ID.
>        *
>        * See drm_plane_create_zpos_property() and
>        * drm_plane_create_zpos_immutable_property() for more details.
> --
> 2.23.0
> 
> 

-- 
Marius Vlad

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to