Hi everyone,

since upstreaming the full dynamic DMA-buf changes turned out more problematic 
than previously thought I've reverted back to individual patches and separated 
out only the locking changes.

So this patch does NOT contain any new callbacks for pinning/unpinning and move 
notification, but only the locking changes necessary.

As previously discussed when the framework detects that the locking semantics 
between exporter and importer are different it just falls back to using a 
cached sgt created during attach time.

While separating the patch set I've most likely stumbled over the problem why 
this previously raised some lockdep warning with i915, it turned out to be just 
a might_lock() at the wrong place.

Please review and/or comment,
Christian.


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to