On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:31:26PM +0800, zhoucm1 wrote:
>
>
> On 2019年07月30日 17:27, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:20:39PM +0800, Chunming Zhou wrote:
> > > It is normal that binary syncobj replaces the underlying fence.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.z...@amd.com>
> > Do we hit this with one of the syncobj igts?
> Unforturnately, No, It's only hit in AMDGPU path, which combines timeline
> and binary to same path when timeline is enabled.
Looks like lionel has something, maybe help review that?
-Daniel
>
> -David
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 3 ---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> > > index 929f7c64f9a2..bc7ec1679e4d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> > > @@ -151,9 +151,6 @@ void drm_syncobj_add_point(struct drm_syncobj
> > > *syncobj,
> > > spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
> > > prev = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj);
> > > - /* You are adding an unorder point to timeline, which could cause
> > > payload returned from query_ioctl is 0! */
> > > - if (prev && prev->seqno >= point)
> > > - DRM_ERROR("You are adding an unorder point to timeline!\n");
> > > dma_fence_chain_init(chain, prev, fence, point);
> > > rcu_assign_pointer(syncobj->fence, &chain->base);
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
