Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22) > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28) > > > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c > > > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644 > > > One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation > > logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass > > into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just > > copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation > > function that takes GFP flags. > > Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion > on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit. > I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
