On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Properties are uapi like anything else, with all the usual rules
> regarding review, testcases, open source userspace ... Furthermore
> driver-private kms properties are highly discouraged, over the past
> few years we've realized we need to make a serious effort at better
> standardizing this stuff.
>
> Again this probably needs multiple pieces to solve this properly:
>
> - Instead of expecting userspace to compute this (and duplicating
> modeset code), the kernel driver should compute when it's possible
> to enable this better up/downscale mode (assuming I understood
> Liviu correctly on what this does) automatically.
>
> - If this is needed for validation then you want a debugfs file to
> force this one way or the other, or alternatively use
> ->atomic_print_state to dump such hidden driver-private state.
> Depends upon how you do your validation ofc.
>
> Fixes: 42b6f118f6d1 ("drm/komeda: Add image enhancement support")
> Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry...@arm.com>
> Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.w...@arm.com>
> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com>
> Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <mal...@foss.arm.com>
> Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.star...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
Hi Daniel:
Thank you for the patch!
Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.w...@arm.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h | 2 --
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c | 19 ++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h
> index c545cb963d40..fb2adc233760 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ struct komeda_plane {
> */
> struct komeda_layer *layer;
>
> - /** @prop_img_enhancement: for on/off image enhancement */
> - struct drm_property *prop_img_enhancement;
> /** @prop_layer_split: for on/off layer_split */
> struct drm_property *prop_layer_split;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> index 04b122f28fb6..23db38650a46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_plane.c
> @@ -197,9 +197,7 @@ komeda_plane_atomic_get_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct komeda_plane *kplane = to_kplane(plane);
> struct komeda_plane_state *st = to_kplane_st(state);
>
> - if (property == kplane->prop_img_enhancement)
> - *val = st->img_enhancement;
> - else if (property == kplane->prop_layer_split)
> + if (property == kplane->prop_layer_split)
> *val = st->layer_split;
> else
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -216,9 +214,7 @@ komeda_plane_atomic_set_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct komeda_plane *kplane = to_kplane(plane);
> struct komeda_plane_state *st = to_kplane_st(state);
>
> - if (property == kplane->prop_img_enhancement)
> - st->img_enhancement = !!val;
> - else if (property == kplane->prop_layer_split)
> + if (property == kplane->prop_layer_split)
> st->layer_split = !!val;
> else
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -258,17 +254,6 @@ komeda_plane_create_layer_properties(struct komeda_plane
> *kplane,
> struct drm_plane *plane = &kplane->base;
> struct drm_property *prop = NULL;
>
> - /* property: layer image_enhancement */
> - if (layer->base.supported_outputs & KOMEDA_PIPELINE_SCALERS) {
> - prop = drm_property_create_bool(drm, DRM_MODE_PROP_ATOMIC,
> - "img_enhancement");
> - if (!prop)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - drm_object_attach_property(&plane->base, prop, 0);
> - kplane->prop_img_enhancement = prop;
> - }
> -
> /* property: layer split */
> if (layer->right) {
> prop = drm_property_create_bool(drm, DRM_MODE_PROP_ATOMIC,
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
