From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
The docs say possible_clones should always include the encoder itself.
Since most drivers don't want to deal with the complexities of cloning
let's allow them to set possible_clones=0 and instead we'll fix that
up in the core.
We can't put this special case into drm_encoder_init() because drivers
will have to fill up possible_clones after adding all the relevant
encoders. Otherwise they wouldn't know the proper encoder indexes to
use. So we'll just do it just before registering the encoders.
TODO: Should we add the bit even if possible_clones was otherwise
populated by the driver?
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
index 7fb47b7b8b44..e87e6fecc1fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_encoder.c
@@ -65,11 +65,26 @@ static const struct drm_prop_enum_list
drm_encoder_enum_list[] = {
{ DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DPI, "DPI" },
};
+/*
+ * For some reason we want the encoder itself included in
+ * possible_clones. Make life easy for drivers by allowing them
+ * to leave possible_clones unset if no cloning is possible.
+ */
+static void fixup_possible_clones(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder;
+
+ drm_for_each_encoder(encoder, dev)
+ encoder->possible_clones |= drm_encoder_mask(encoder);
+}
+
int drm_encoder_register_all(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_encoder *encoder;
int ret = 0;
+ fixup_possible_clones(dev);
+
drm_for_each_encoder(encoder, dev) {
if (encoder->funcs->late_register)
ret = encoder->funcs->late_register(encoder);
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
