On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > At the moment, there is an inconsistency in the way modes are named. > Modes with timings parsed from the EDID information will call > drm_mode_set_name(), which will name the mode using this form: > > <horizontal-res>x<vertical-res><interlace-char> > > eg, 1920x1080i for an interlaced mode, or 1920x1080 for a progressive > mode. > > However, timings parsed using the tables in drm_edid_modes.h do not > have the 'i' suffix. You are left to deduce that they're interlaced > from xrandr's output by the lower vertical refresh frequencies. > > This patch changes the interlaced mode names in drm_edid_modes.h to > follow the style set by drm_mode_set_name(), which makes it clear > in xrandr which modes are interlaced and which are not (as xrandr > groups the refresh rates on a line according to the name field.) > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
