On 2019-04-18 10:26 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Ok correction: amd has stuck out in the past too, there was some vblank vs > pageflip stuff where we needed to do some pretty clever tricks to both > have the new stricter semantics for everyone, while keeping the amd ddx > happy still. This aint new at all, we fixed up the regressions and moved > on.
That sounds like something I would have been involved in, but I'm not sure what you mean... I fixed the amdgpu/radeon kernel drivers to obey the general KMS rules for vblank vs page flips, and added DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_TARGET to allow userspace to take advantage of our hardware's capabilities to avoid delaying a page flip by one refresh cycle in some cases. That's all. > tldr; You're categorical rejection doesn't make sense to me. > Slightly over the top, but this feels like gut reaction to radv being a > thorn for amd. That's a weird insinuation. If RADV was a "thorn for AMD", surely we'd be having a party about this regression instead of insisting that it be fixed thoroughly. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
