> On Mar 8, 2019, at 10:36 PM, Kangjie Lu <k...@umn.edu> wrote:
> 
> alloc_ordered_workqueue may fail and return NULL.
> The fix returns ENOMEM when it fails to avoid potential NULL
> pointer dereference.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <k...@umn.edu>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> index 8a9aeb0a9ea8..bb66dbcd5e3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ int vkms_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct 
> drm_crtc *crtc,
>       spin_lock_init(&vkms_out->state_lock);
> 
>       vkms_out->crc_workq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("vkms_crc_workq", 0);
> +     if (!vkms_out->crc_workq)
> +             return -ENOMEM;

Is this a reasonable patch?

> 
>       return ret;
> }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to