On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:33:07AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Trivial fixes identified while working on the DRM code.
> 
>   s/artifically/artificially/
>   s/achive/achieve/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: - Actually spell achieve correctly!

drm convention is to put this above the --- so that it gets included in
the commit msg.

With that
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index 540a77a2ade9..2453678d1186 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>        *
>        * NOTE: Commit work has multiple phases, first hardware commit, then
>        * cleanup. We want them to overlap, hence need system_unbound_wq to
> -      * make sure work items don't artifically stall on each another.
> +      * make sure work items don't artificially stall on each another.
>        */
>  
>       drm_atomic_state_get(state);
> @@ -1786,7 +1786,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_commit);
>   *
>   * Asynchronous workers need to have sufficient parallelism to be able to run
>   * different atomic commits on different CRTCs in parallel. The simplest way 
> to
> - * achive this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
> + * achieve this is by running them on the &system_unbound_wq work queue. Note
>   * that drivers are not required to split up atomic commits and run an
>   * individual commit in parallel - userspace is supposed to do that if it 
> cares.
>   * But it might be beneficial to do that for modesets, since those 
> necessarily
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to