Hi,
> > > static void bochs_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> > > {
> > > @@ -66,6 +71,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs bochs_crtc_funcs = {
> > > static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs bochs_helper_funcs = {
> > > .mode_set_nofb = bochs_crtc_mode_set_nofb,
> > > .atomic_enable = bochs_crtc_atomic_enable,
> > > + .atomic_disable = bochs_crtc_atomic_disable,
> >
> > Shouldn't we make the callback optional instead of adding empty dummy
> > functions to drivers?
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> I agree, and I can work in this issue.
> Just one question, should we make atomic_enable optional as well?
IIRC the drm code checks for the atomic_enable callback presence to
figure whenever it should take the atomic or legacy code paths.
So, I think that will not work.
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
