Hi Jyri,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:18:50PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> drm_fb_cma_get_gem_obj() may return NULL. The return value needs to be
> checked before dereferencing the returned pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsa...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> index 1067e702c22c..a8ae064f52bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ static void set_scanout(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct 
> drm_framebuffer *fb)
>       u64 dma_base_and_ceiling;
>  
>       gem = drm_fb_cma_get_gem_obj(fb, 0);
> +     if (WARN_ON(!gem))
> +             return;

But this should not happen, right ? Don't we have the required checks in
place to ensure there will always be a valid GEM object available here ?

>       start = gem->paddr + fb->offsets[0] +
>               crtc->y * fb->pitches[0] +

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to