Hi Manasi, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:59:30AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > Thanks for the patch. Verified with the DP 1.4 spec and looks good to me. > Also look at the related patch that makes use of the correct extended > capabilities: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/249400/ >
If I'm not mistaken, you could get rid of the patch in the Intel driver
when we have this one merged. Is there any reason not to, have I missed
something?
Thanks,
Quentin
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
>
> Manasi
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:54:37PM +0100, Damian Kos wrote:
> > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > DP 1.4 introduced a DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit in
> > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL register. If set, DPCD registers from
> > DP_DPCD_REV to DP_ADAPTER_CAP should be retrieved starting from
> > DP_DPCD_REV_EXTENDED. All registers are copied except DP_DPCD_REV,
> > DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT which represent the
> > "true capabilities" of DPRX device.
> >
> > Original DP_DPCD_REV, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT
> > might falsely return lower capabilities to "avoid interoperability
> > issues with some of the existing DP Source devices that malfunction
> > when they discover the higher capabilities within those three
> > registers.".
> >
> > Before DP 1.4, DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit was reserved
> > and read 0 so it's safe to check against it even if DP revision is
> > <1.4
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Damian Kos <d...@cadence.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 8c6b9fd89f8a..735ebde5c2f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -370,10 +370,38 @@ int drm_dp_link_probe(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct
> > drm_dp_link *link)
> > {
> > u8 values[3];
> > int err;
> > + unsigned int addr;
> >
> > memset(link, 0, sizeof(*link));
> >
> > - err = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, DP_DPCD_REV, values, sizeof(values));
> > + /*
> > + * DP 1.4 introduced a DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit in
> > + * DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL register. If set, DPCD registers from
> > + * DP_DPCD_REV to DP_ADAPTER_CAP should be retrieved starting from
> > + * DP_DPCD_REV_EXTENDED. All registers are copied except DP_DPCD_REV,
> > + * DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT which represent the
> > + * "true capabilities" of DPRX device.
> > + *
> > + * Original DP_DPCD_REV, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT
> > + * might falsely return lower capabilities to "avoid interoperability
> > + * issues with some of the existing DP Source devices that malfunction
> > + * when they discover the higher capabilities within those three
> > + * registers.".
> > + *
> > + * Before DP 1.4, DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit was
> > reserved
> > + * and read 0 so it's safe to check against it even if DP revision is
> > + * <1.4
> > + */
> > + err = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL, values);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (values[0] & DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT)
> > + addr = DP_DP13_DPCD_REV;
> > + else
> > + addr = DP_DPCD_REV;
> > +
> > + err = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, addr, values, sizeof(values));
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
