On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Sumit Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 25 May 2012 14:34, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
>>
>> include/linux/dma-buf.h: In function ‘dma_buf_vmap’:
>> include/linux/dma-buf.h:260:1: warning: no return statement in function
>> returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
>>
>> Reported-by: w...@linux.intel.com
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> index d8c2865..506bb7b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static inline void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>>
>> static inline void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> {
>> + return NULL;
>> }
> I fixed this as part of rebasing while applying your vmap patch to my
> for-next - so it is already in my pull request.
>
Ah I didn't read the full warning mail, it was giving out about Tomasz
tree, he must have merged an older version.
Thanks,
Dave.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
