Hi Ulrich,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 16:49:55 EEST Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> From: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka...@renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c index b52b3e8..cd6803a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_set_display_timing(struct
> rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc) unsigned long rate;
>               u32 extdiv;
> 
> +             clk_set_rate(rcrtc->extclock, mode_clock);

This is a hack, Jacopo has posted "[PATCH 3/3] drm: rcar-du: Improve non-DPLL 
clock selection" which I think is a better solution (or will be in v2 :-)).

>               extclk = clk_get_rate(rcrtc->extclock);
>               if (rcdu->info->dpll_ch & (1 << rcrtc->index)) {
>                       unsigned long target = mode_clock;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to