On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:58:19AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > A FB with no object is something we should be shouting very loudly
> > about, not quietly logging as debug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com>
> > Cc: CK Hu <ck...@mediatek.com>
> > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > index 2f4b0ffee598..ac010365d88b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > @@ -95,10 +95,7 @@ static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane
> > *plane,
> > if (!fb)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (!mtk_fb_get_gem_obj(fb)) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("buffer is null\n");
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > - }
> > + WARN_ON(!mtk_fb_get_gem_obj(fb));
>
> We should presumably still bail out with an error, no?I think we should just remove this WARN_ON(). Under what circumstances would this case even happen? If the GEM object for a framebuffer doesn't exist, then mtk_drm_mode_fb_create() will fail and no pointer to struct drm_framebuffer will ever be returned. After that, the GEM object is guaranteed to be there, so the above is effectively dead code. Thierry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
