As discussed with Michel that name better
describes the behavior of this function.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsim...@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h        |    2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c |    2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c  |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 35db5bd..d73bba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ void radeon_fence_process(struct radeon_device *rdev, int 
ring);
 bool radeon_fence_signaled(struct radeon_fence *fence);
 int radeon_fence_wait(struct radeon_fence *fence, bool interruptible);
 int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
-int radeon_fence_wait_last(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
+int radeon_fence_wait_empty(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
 struct radeon_fence *radeon_fence_ref(struct radeon_fence *fence);
 void radeon_fence_unref(struct radeon_fence **fence);
 int radeon_fence_count_emitted(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
index dedb398..89be94b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c
@@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ int radeon_suspend_kms(struct drm_device *dev, pm_message_t 
state)
        radeon_bo_evict_vram(rdev);
        /* wait for gpu to finish processing current batch */
        for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; i++)
-               radeon_fence_wait_last(rdev, i);
+               radeon_fence_wait_empty(rdev, i);
 
        radeon_save_bios_scratch_regs(rdev);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
index 2fbbc34..2d13843 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next(struct radeon_device *rdev, int 
ring)
        return r;
 }
 
-int radeon_fence_wait_last(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
+int radeon_fence_wait_empty(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
 {
        unsigned long irq_flags;
        struct radeon_fence *fence;
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ void radeon_fence_driver_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev)
        for (ring = 0; ring < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ring++) {
                if (!rdev->fence_drv[ring].initialized)
                        continue;
-               radeon_fence_wait_last(rdev, ring);
+               radeon_fence_wait_empty(rdev, ring);
                wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].queue);
                write_lock_irqsave(&rdev->fence_lock, irq_flags);
                radeon_scratch_free(rdev, rdev->fence_drv[ring].scratch_reg);
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to