"Mao, David" <david....@amd.com> writes: > Hi Keith, > If I read the patch correctly, the plane has been interpreted as the same as > connector, and the stackIndex is the index of connector of current device. > Is it by intentional? > If the hardware don't have underlay/overlay supported, is it better to > always report plane 0 rather than pretend to have multiple plane?
Yes, you're right. I must have mis-read the specification when writing this function. Thanks for catching this. I've merged this fix into the patch and re-pushed it to my drm-lease-v2 branch. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
