Hi Jyri,

Thank you for the patch.

On Friday, 16 February 2018 13:25:07 EET Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Register the omapdrm device when we know that dss device probe going
> to succeed. This avoids DSS6 and DSS2 omapdrm device registration from
> colliding with each other.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsa...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c | 26 ++------------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c  | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c index acef7ec..6c9f667 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/core.c
> @@ -45,36 +45,14 @@ static struct platform_driver * const omap_dss_drivers[]
> = { #endif
>  };
> 
> -static struct platform_device *omap_drm_device;
> -
>  static int __init omap_dss_init(void)
>  {
> -     int r;
> -
> -     r = platform_register_drivers(omap_dss_drivers,
> -                                   ARRAY_SIZE(omap_dss_drivers));
> -     if (r)
> -             goto err_reg;
> -
> -     omap_drm_device = platform_device_register_simple("omapdrm", 0, NULL, 
> 0);
> -     if (IS_ERR(omap_drm_device)) {
> -             r = PTR_ERR(omap_drm_device);
> -             goto err_reg;
> -     }
> -
> -     return 0;
> -
> -err_reg:
> -     platform_unregister_drivers(omap_dss_drivers,
> -                                 ARRAY_SIZE(omap_dss_drivers));
> -
> -     return r;
> +     return platform_register_drivers(omap_dss_drivers,
> +                                      ARRAY_SIZE(omap_dss_drivers));
>  }
> 
>  static void __exit omap_dss_exit(void)
>  {
> -     platform_device_unregister(omap_drm_device);
> -
>       platform_unregister_drivers(omap_dss_drivers,
>                                   ARRAY_SIZE(omap_dss_drivers));
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c index 5752328..dda3237 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dss.c
> @@ -1314,6 +1314,17 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute
> dss_soc_devices[] = { { /* sentinel */ }
>  };
> 
> +static struct platform_device *omap_drm_device;

Let's store this in the dss_device structure instead of adding a new global 
variable. I've spent enough time chasing the globals, I don't want any new one 
:-)

> +static int initialize_omapdrm_device(void)
> +{
> +     omap_drm_device = platform_device_register_simple("omapdrm", 0, NULL, 
> 0);
> +     if (IS_ERR(omap_drm_device))
> +             return PTR_ERR(omap_drm_device);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int dss_bind(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       struct dss_device *dss = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1323,6 +1334,12 @@ static int dss_bind(struct device *dev)
>       if (r)
>               return r;
> 
> +     r = initialize_omapdrm_device();
> +     if (r) {
> +             component_unbind_all(dev, NULL);
> +             return r;
> +     }
> +

Should this be called after omapdss_gather_components() and omapdss_set_dss() 
to make sure the omapdrm probe won't be deferred by the DSS not being 
initialized ?

>       pm_set_vt_switch(0);
> 
>       omapdss_gather_components(dev);
> @@ -1335,6 +1352,8 @@ static void dss_unbind(struct device *dev)
>  {
>       omapdss_set_dss(NULL);
> 
> +     platform_device_unregister(omap_drm_device);
> +

Same here, should this be called before omapdss_set_dss() for symmetry ?

>       component_unbind_all(dev, NULL);
>  }

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to