On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:11:29 +0200 Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 06:26 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > So port hotplug is always reporting that port C has a hotplug
> > interrupt though... If you write 0x3 back to it does the interrupt
> > stop?
>
> I'm not sure I got it right. This doesn't help:
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1416,6 +1416,17 @@ static irqreturn_t
> i915_driver_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS)
> iir = new_iir;
> }
>
> + if (ret == IRQ_NONE) {
> + u32 hp = I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT);
> + if (hp) {
> + I915_WRITE(PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT, hp);
> + I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT);
> + }
> +
> + if (printk_ratelimit())
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: %.8x\n", __func__, hp);
> +
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
Yeah that looks right, you still get 0x300?
You could try masking hotplug interrupts altogether.
Also, just to sanity check things, can you look at the output of "lspci
-s 02.0 -vvv -xxx" and see if the "INTx" field is + or -? If it's +,
then the interrupt is definitely coming from an un-acked IRQ source on
the gfx device. If it's INTx-, it means something in one of the upper
MSI layers isn't getting handled right.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
