https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104660
--- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Andy Furniss from comment #3)
> Thanks, that works.
>
> This is the same with non dc, but is there a reason they are a bit low?
>
> 1920x1080 (0x5b) 285.500MHz +HSync -VSync
> h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock
> 137.26KHz
> v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1144 clock
> 119.98Hz
>
> 1920x1080 (0x5c) 260.250MHz +HSync -VSync
> h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock
> 125.12KHz
> v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1138 clock
> 109.95Hz
>
> 1920x1080 (0x5d) 235.500MHz +HSync -VSync
> h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock
> 113.22KHz
> v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1133 clock
> 99.93Hz
>
> I was hoping DC would differ from the old driver in giving exact Hz for
> these.
Those are the modes from the EDID from your monitor:
CEA extension block
Extension version: 1
0 8-byte timing descriptors
Detailed mode: Clock 235.500 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm
1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0
1080 1083 1088 1133 vborder 0
+hsync -vsync
Detailed mode: Clock 260.250 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm
1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0
1080 1083 1088 1138 vborder 0
+hsync -vsync
Detailed mode: Clock 285.500 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm
1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0
1080 1083 1088 1144 vborder 0
+hsync -vsync
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
