On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:10:26AM +0700, Nhan Nguyen wrote: > From: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> > > commit 651e4769ba2a9f20c4b8a823ae2727bf7fa9c9f0 upstream. > > In chasing down issues with EDID probing, I found some > duplicated but incomplete logic used to power the chip on and > off. > > This patch refactors the adv7511_power_on/off functions, so > they can be used for internal needs. > > Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie> > Cc: Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com> > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <l...@metafoo.de> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Thong Ho <thong.ho...@rvc.renesas.com> > Signed-off-by: Nhan Nguyen <nhan.nguyen...@renesas.com> > Link: > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484614372-15342-5-git-send-email-john.stu...@linaro.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why are you asking for these 3 patches to be backported to the 4.9 stable tree? What bugs are they fixing? How do they meet the stable kernel rules? totally confused, greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
