Den 31.08.2017 12.18, skrev Laurent Pinchart:
Hi Noralf,

Thank you for the patch.

On Monday, 28 August 2017 20:17:46 EEST Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Might as well embed drm_device since tinydrm_device (embeds pipe struct
and fbdev pointer) needs to stick around after driver-device unbind to
handle open fd's after device removal.

Cc: David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <nor...@tronnes.org>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-core.c | 44  ++++++++++++-------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-pipe.c |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c          |  8 +++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c          | 12 ++++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/repaper.c           | 10 +++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c            | 16 +++++------
  include/drm/tinydrm/tinydrm.h               |  9 +++++-
  7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-core.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-core.c index 551709e..f11f4cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/core/tinydrm-core.c
[snip]

@@ -142,23 +142,16 @@ static int tinydrm_init(struct device *parent, struct
tinydrm_device *tdev, const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs *fb_funcs,
                        struct drm_driver *driver)
  {
-       struct drm_device *drm;
+       struct drm_device *drm = &tdev->drm;
+       int ret;

        mutex_init(&tdev->dirty_lock);
        tdev->fb_funcs = fb_funcs;

-       /*
-        * We don't embed drm_device, because that prevent us from using
-        * devm_kzalloc() to allocate tinydrm_device in the driver since
-        * drm_dev_unref() frees the structure. The devm_ functions provide
-        * for easy error handling.
Don't you then need a custom drm_driver.release handler to free the parent
structure ?

I rely on the fact that drm_device is the first member in the driver
structure and thus it will be freed in drm_dev_release(). A later patch
adds a drm_driver.release function though.

Noralf.

-        */
-       drm = drm_dev_alloc(driver, parent);
-       if (IS_ERR(drm))
-               return PTR_ERR(drm);
-
-       tdev->drm = drm;
-       drm->dev_private = tdev;
+       ret = drm_dev_init(drm, driver, parent);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
        drm_mode_config_init(drm);
        drm->mode_config.funcs = &tinydrm_mode_config_funcs;

[snip]

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c index 7e5bb7d..77d40c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mi0283qt.c
[snip]

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static int mi0283qt_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
        u32 rotation = 0;
        int ret;

-       mipi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mipi), GFP_KERNEL);
+       mipi = kzalloc(sizeof(*mipi), GFP_KERNEL);
Where's the related kfree() ?

        if (!mipi)
                return -ENOMEM;
[snip]

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/repaper.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/repaper.c index 30dc97b..b8fc8eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/repaper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/repaper.c
[snip]

@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int repaper_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
                }
        }

-       epd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*epd), GFP_KERNEL);
+       epd = kzalloc(sizeof(*epd), GFP_KERNEL);
Ditto.

        if (!epd)
                return -ENOMEM;
[snip]

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c index b439956..bc2b905 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
[snip]

@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int st7586_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
        u32 rotation = 0;
        int ret;

-       mipi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mipi), GFP_KERNEL);
+       mipi = kzalloc(sizeof(*mipi), GFP_KERNEL);
Ang here again.

        if (!mipi)
                return -ENOMEM;
[snip]


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to