On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> From: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> 
> This allows device drivers to request resizing their BARs.
> 
> The function only tries to reprogram the windows of the bridge directly above
> the requesting device and only the BAR of the same type (usually mem, 64bit,
> prefetchable). This is done to make sure not to disturb other drivers by
> changing the BARs of their devices.
> 
> If reprogramming the bridge BAR fails the old status is restored and -ENOSPC
> returned to the calling device driver.
> 
> v2: rebase on changes in rbar support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 61 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h     |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index f30ca75..cfab2c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -1923,6 +1923,67 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct 
> pci_dev *bridge)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources);
>  
> +int pci_reassign_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge, unsigned long type)
> +{
> +     const unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM |
> +             IORESOURCE_PREFETCH | IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
> +
> +     struct resource saved;
> +     LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> +     LIST_HEAD(fail_head);
> +     struct pci_dev_resource *fail_res;
> +     unsigned i;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     /* Release all children from the matching bridge resource */
> +     for (i = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END; ++i) {

Nit: use post-increment unless you need pre-increment.

> +             struct resource *res = &bridge->resource[i];
> +
> +             if ((res->flags & type_mask) != (type & type_mask))
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             saved = *res;
> +             if (res->parent) {
> +                     release_child_resources(res);

Doesn't this recursively release *all* child resources?  There could
be BARs from several devices, or even windows of downstream bridges,
inside this window.  The drivers of those other devices aren't
expecting things to change here.

> +                     release_resource(res);
> +             }
> +             res->start = 0;
> +             res->end = 0;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (i == PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END)
> +             return -ENOENT;
> +
> +     __pci_bus_size_bridges(bridge->subordinate, &add_list);
> +     __pci_bridge_assign_resources(bridge, &add_list, &fail_head);
> +     BUG_ON(!list_empty(&add_list));
> +
> +     /* restore size and flags */
> +     list_for_each_entry(fail_res, &fail_head, list) {
> +             struct resource *res = fail_res->res;
> +
> +             res->start = fail_res->start;
> +             res->end = fail_res->end;
> +             res->flags = fail_res->flags;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Revert to the old configuration */
> +     if (!list_empty(&fail_head)) {
> +             struct resource *res = &bridge->resource[i];
> +
> +             res->start = saved.start;
> +             res->end = saved.end;
> +             res->flags = saved.flags;
> +
> +             pci_claim_resource(bridge, i);
> +             ret = -ENOSPC;
> +     }
> +
> +     free_list(&fail_head);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>       struct pci_dev *dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> index 9526e34..3bb1e29 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,57 @@ int pci_reassign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int 
> resno, resource_size_t addsiz
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int pci_resize_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int size)
> +{
> +     struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno;
> +     u32 sizes = pci_rbar_get_possible_sizes(dev, resno);
> +     int old = pci_rbar_get_current_size(dev, resno);
> +     u64 bytes = 1ULL << (size + 20);
> +     int ret = 0;

I think we should fail the request if the device is enabled, i.e., if
the PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY bit is set.  We can't safely change the BAR
while memory decoding is enabled.

I know there's code in pci_std_update_resource() that turns off
PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, but I think that's a mistake: I think it should
fail when asked to update an enabled BAR the same way
pci_iov_update_resource() does.

I'm not sure why you call pci_reenable_device() below, but I think I
would rather have the driver do something like this:

  pci_disable_device(dev);
  pci_resize_resource(dev, 0, size);
  pci_enable_device(dev);

That way it's very clear to the driver that it must re-read all BARs
after resizing this one.

> +     if (!sizes)
> +             return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +     if (!(sizes & (1 << size)))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (old < 0)
> +             return old;
> +
> +     /* Make sure the resource isn't assigned before making it larger. */
> +     if (resource_size(res) < bytes && res->parent) {
> +             release_resource(res);
> +             res->end = resource_size(res) - 1;
> +             res->start = 0;
> +             if (resno < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES)
> +                     pci_update_resource(dev, resno);

Why do we need to write this zero to the BAR?  If PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY
is set, I think this is dangerous, and if it's not set, I think it's
unnecessary.

I think we should set the IORESOURCE_UNSET bit to indicate that the
resource does not have an address assigned to it.  It should get
cleared later anyway, but having IORESOURCE_UNSET will make any debug
messages emitted while reassigning resources make more sense.

> +     }
> +
> +     ret = pci_rbar_set_size(dev, resno, size);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto error_reassign;
> +
> +     res->end = res->start + bytes - 1;
> +
> +     ret = pci_reassign_bridge_resources(dev->bus->self, res->flags);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto error_resize;
> +
> +     pci_reenable_device(dev->bus->self);

> +     return 0;
> +
> +error_resize:
> +     pci_rbar_set_size(dev, resno, old);
> +     res->end = res->start + (1ULL << (old + 20)) - 1;
> +
> +error_reassign:
> +     pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(dev->bus);
> +     pci_setup_bridge(dev->bus);

Could this bridge-related recovery code go inside
pci_reassign_bridge_resources()?

> +     pci_reenable_device(dev->bus->self);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_resize_resource);
> +
>  int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
>  {
>       u16 cmd, old_cmd;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 6954e50..8eaebb4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ void pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev 
> *dev);
>  void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno);
>  int __must_check pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i);
>  int __must_check pci_reassign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i, 
> resource_size_t add_size, resource_size_t align);
> +int __must_check pci_resize_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i, int size);
>  int pci_select_bars(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned long flags);
>  bool pci_device_is_present(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  void pci_ignore_hotplug(struct pci_dev *dev);
> @@ -1135,6 +1136,7 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void);
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge);
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +int pci_reassign_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge, unsigned long 
> type);
>  void pdev_enable_device(struct pci_dev *);
>  int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *, int mask);
>  void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *),
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to