On 16/02/17 04:10 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>
>
> Open-code the initial ttm_bo_validate call, so that we can properly
> unlock the reservation lock when it fails. Also, properly destruct
> the reservation object when the first part of TTM BO initialization
> fails.
>
> Actual deadlocks caused by the missing unlock should have been fixed
> by "drm/ttm: never add BO that failed to validate to the LRU list",
> superseding the flawed fix in commit 38fc4856ad98 ("drm/amdgpu: fix
> a potential deadlock in amdgpu_bo_create_restricted()").
>
> This change fixes remaining recursive locking errors that can be seen
> with lock debugging enabled, and avoids the error of freeing a locked
> mutex.
>
> v2: use ttm_bo_unref for error handling, and rebase on latest changes
>
> Fixes: 12a852219583 ("drm/amdgpu: improve AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CLEARED
> handling (v2)")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> index c2e57f7..15944ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> @@ -404,15 +404,31 @@ int amdgpu_bo_create_restricted(struct amdgpu_device
> *adev,
> }
>
> initial_bytes_moved = atomic64_read(&adev->num_bytes_moved);
> - r = ttm_bo_init(&adev->mman.bdev, &bo->tbo, size, type,
> - &bo->placement, page_align, !kernel, NULL,
> - acc_size, sg, resv ? resv : &bo->tbo.ttm_resv,
> - &amdgpu_ttm_bo_destroy);
> + r = ttm_bo_init_top(&adev->mman.bdev, &bo->tbo, size, type,
> + page_align, NULL,
> + acc_size, sg, resv ? resv : &bo->tbo.ttm_resv,
> + &amdgpu_ttm_bo_destroy);
> +
> + if (likely(r == 0))
> + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, !kernel, false);
> +
> + if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
> + struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo = &bo->tbo;
> +
> + if (!resv)
> + ww_mutex_unlock(&bo->tbo.ttm_resv.lock);
> + ttm_bo_unref(&tbo);
> + return r;
> + }
I think this would be clearer as
if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo = &bo->tbo;
if (!resv)
ww_mutex_unlock(&bo->tbo.ttm_resv.lock);
ttm_bo_unref(&tbo);
return r;
}
r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, !kernel, false);
[...]
> amdgpu_cs_report_moved_bytes(adev,
> atomic64_read(&adev->num_bytes_moved) - initial_bytes_moved);
>
> - if (unlikely(r != 0))
> - return r;
> + if (!(bo->tbo.mem.placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT)) {
> + spin_lock(&bo->tbo.glob->lru_lock);
> + ttm_bo_add_to_lru(&bo->tbo);
> + spin_unlock(&bo->tbo.glob->lru_lock);
> + }
It's a bit ugly to open-code this logic in driver code. Maybe add
another TTM helper which calls ttm_bo_validate and ttm_bo_add_to_lru?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
