On 18 January 2017 at 09:02, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com> > > ARM SoCs usually have their DRM/KMS devices on the platform bus, so add > support for that to enable these devices to be used with the drmDevice > infrastructure. > > NVIDIA Tegra SoCs have an additional level in the hierarchy and DRM/KMS > devices can also be on the host1x bus. This is mostly equivalent to the > platform bus. > Re the indentation suggestion: either one is fine imho - coding style in libdrm is messy ;-)
> @@ -3576,6 +3846,20 @@ int drmGetDevice2(int fd, uint32_t flags, drmDevicePtr > *device) > > break; > > + case DRM_BUS_PLATFORM: > + ret = drmProcessPlatformDevice(&d, node, node_type, maj, min, > true, flags); > + if (ret) > + goto free_devices; > + > + break; > + > + case DRM_BUS_HOST1X: > + ret = drmProcessHost1xDevice(&d, node, node_type, maj, min, > true, flags); > + if (ret) > + goto free_devices; > + > + break; > + > default: > continue; > } > @@ -3716,6 +4000,22 @@ int drmGetDevices2(uint32_t flags, drmDevicePtr > devices[], int max_devices) > > break; > > + case DRM_BUS_PLATFORM: > + ret = drmProcessPlatformDevice(&device, node, node_type, maj, > min, > + devices != NULL, flags); > + if (ret) > + goto free_devices; > + > + break; > + > + case DRM_BUS_HOST1X: > + ret = drmProcessHost1xDevice(&device, node, node_type, maj, min, > + devices != NULL, flags); > + if (ret) > + goto free_devices; > + We want to continue on error - feel free to squash before pushing. With that the original r-b (for the series) still stands. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
