Patch 1/4 is already on linux-next, but what about this one? Ping?
On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 18:41 CEST, Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna at
collabora.com> wrote:
> Configures the GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ bridge on the dts file.
>
> Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch at collabora.co.uk>
> Cc: Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly at ge.com>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at dowhile0.org>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna at collabora.com>
> ---
> Unchanged from V4
>
> Changes from V3:
> - 4/4 instead of 5/5
>
> Unchanged from V2
>
> Changes from V1:
> - Replaced '_' by '-' in node names or compatible strings
> - Added missing @73 to b850v3-lvds-dp-bridge
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> index 167f744..8db3bf2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> @@ -72,6 +72,13 @@
> fsl,data-mapping = "spwg";
> fsl,data-width = <24>;
> status = "okay";
> +
> + port at 4 {
> + reg = <4>;
> + lvds0_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&b850v3_lvds_dp_bridge_in>;
> + };
> + };
> };
> };
>
> @@ -142,3 +149,26 @@
> reg = <0x4a>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&mux2_i2c2 {
> + status = "okay";
> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> +
> + b850v3-lvds-dp-bridge at 73 {
> + compatible = "ge,b850v3-lvds-dp";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <0x73>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + edid-reg = <0x72>;
> +
> + port {
> + b850v3_lvds_dp_bridge_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.5.5
>
