On 19.09.2016 23:12, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:27 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote:
>> @@ -122,14 +126,14 @@ int udl_handle_damage(struct udl_framebuffer *fb, int
>> x, int y,
>> return 0;
>> cmd = urb->transfer_buffer;
>>
>> - for (i = y; i < height ; i++) {
>> + for (i = y; i <= y2 ; i++) {
>
> I think a simpler fix (which retains Noralf's nice cleanup would be to
> change the loop condition to i < y + height. At least that seems to be
> the underlying bug. Can you pls test that and then submit either that
> one-liner (if it works) or your original patch (it's missing the
> signed-off-by right now, so can't be merged as-is)? Either one has my
> r-b (preemptive since I'm travelling).
>
> Thanks, Daniel
>
Feel free to (re)send patch v3, whenever you can.
After all, the idea is yours.
Respect
