Am 20.10.2016 um 08:47 schrieb Chris Wilson: > I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, > and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA > operations to make room. > > A consensus was reached in > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html > that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. > Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it > remains a good thing! > > coccinelle script: > @@ > > @@ > ( > - struct fence > + struct dma_fence > | > - struct fence_ops > + struct dma_fence_ops > | > - struct fence_cb > + struct dma_fence_cb > | > - enum fence_flag_bits > + enum dma_fence_flag_bits > ) > > @@ > > @@ > ( > - fence_init > + dma_fence_init > | > - fence_release > + dma_fence_release > | > - fence_free > + dma_fence_free > | > - fence_get > + dma_fence_get > | > - fence_get_rcu > + dma_fence_get_rcu > | > - fence_get_rcu_safe > + dma_fence_get_rcu_safe > | > - fence_put > + dma_fence_put > | > - fence_signal > + dma_fence_signal > | > - fence_signal_locked > + dma_fence_signal_locked > | > - fence_default_wait > + dma_fence_default_wait > | > - fence_add_callback > + dma_fence_add_callback > | > - fence_remove_callback > + dma_fence_remove_callback > | > - fence_enable_sw_signaling > + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling > | > - fence_is_signaled_locked > + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked > | > - fence_is_signaled > + dma_fence_is_signaled > | > - fence_is_later > + dma_fence_is_later > | > - fence_later > + dma_fence_later > | > - fence_wait_timeout > + dma_fence_wait_timeout > | > - fence_wait_any_timeout > + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout > | > - fence_wait > + dma_fence_wait > | > - fence_context_alloc > + dma_fence_context_alloc > | > - FENCE_TRACE > + DMA_FENCE_TRACE > | > - FENCE_WARN > + DMA_FENCE_WARN > | > - FENCE_ERR > + DMA_FENCE_ERR > ) > ( > ... > ) > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>.
