On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:20:54PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > This patch aims to replace the roll-your-own seqlock implementation with
> > full-blown seqlock'. We also remove the timestamp ring-buffer in favour
> > of single timestamp/count pair protected by a seqlock. In turn this
> > means we can now increment the vblank freely without the need for
> > clamping.
> > 
> > v2:
> >   - reduce the scope of the seqlock, keeping vblank_time_lock
> >   - make the seqlock per vblank_crtc, so multiple readers aren't blocked by
> >     the writer
> > 
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> 
> LGTM
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Applied to drm-misc, thanks.
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 90 
> > +++++++----------------------------------------
> >  include/drm/drmP.h        | 14 +++-----
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > index 3c1a6f1..0e95100 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > @@ -42,10 +42,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/vgaarb.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  
> > -/* Access macro for slots in vblank timestamp ringbuffer. */
> > -#define vblanktimestamp(dev, pipe, count) \
> > -   ((dev)->vblank[pipe].time[(count) % DRM_VBLANKTIME_RBSIZE])
> > -
> >  /* Retry timestamp calculation up to 3 times to satisfy
> >   * drm_timestamp_precision before giving up.
> >   */
> > @@ -82,29 +78,15 @@ static void store_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, 
> > unsigned int pipe,
> >                      struct timeval *t_vblank, u32 last)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];
> > -   u32 tslot;
> >  
> >     assert_spin_locked(&dev->vblank_time_lock);
> >  
> >     vblank->last = last;
> >  
> > -   /* All writers hold the spinlock, but readers are serialized by
> > -    * the latching of vblank->count below.
> > -    */
> > -   tslot = vblank->count + vblank_count_inc;
> > -   vblanktimestamp(dev, pipe, tslot) = *t_vblank;
> > -
> > -   /*
> > -    * vblank timestamp updates are protected on the write side with
> > -    * vblank_time_lock, but on the read side done locklessly using a
> > -    * sequence-lock on the vblank counter. Ensure correct ordering using
> > -    * memory barrriers. We need the barrier both before and also after the
> > -    * counter update to synchronize with the next timestamp write.
> > -    * The read-side barriers for this are in drm_vblank_count_and_time.
> > -    */
> > -   smp_wmb();
> > +   write_seqlock(&vblank->seqlock);
> > +   vblank->time = *t_vblank;
> >     vblank->count += vblank_count_inc;
> > -   smp_wmb();
> > +   write_sequnlock(&vblank->seqlock);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -205,7 +187,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> >             const struct timeval *t_old;
> >             u64 diff_ns;
> >  
> > -           t_old = &vblanktimestamp(dev, pipe, vblank->count);
> > +           t_old = &vblank->time;
> >             diff_ns = timeval_to_ns(&t_vblank) - timeval_to_ns(t_old);
> >  
> >             /*
> > @@ -239,49 +221,6 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, unsigned int pipe,
> >             diff = 1;
> >     }
> >  
> > -   /*
> > -    * FIMXE: Need to replace this hack with proper seqlocks.
> > -    *
> > -    * Restrict the bump of the software vblank counter to a safe maximum
> > -    * value of +1 whenever there is the possibility that concurrent readers
> > -    * of vblank timestamps could be active at the moment, as the current
> > -    * implementation of the timestamp caching and updating is not safe
> > -    * against concurrent readers for calls to store_vblank() with a bump
> > -    * of anything but +1. A bump != 1 would very likely return corrupted
> > -    * timestamps to userspace, because the same slot in the cache could
> > -    * be concurrently written by store_vblank() and read by one of those
> > -    * readers without the read-retry logic detecting the collision.
> > -    *
> > -    * Concurrent readers can exist when we are called from the
> > -    * drm_vblank_off() or drm_vblank_on() functions and other non-vblank-
> > -    * irq callers. However, all those calls to us are happening with the
> > -    * vbl_lock locked to prevent drm_vblank_get(), so the vblank refcount
> > -    * can't increase while we are executing. Therefore a zero refcount at
> > -    * this point is safe for arbitrary counter bumps if we are called
> > -    * outside vblank irq, a non-zero count is not 100% safe. Unfortunately
> > -    * we must also accept a refcount of 1, as whenever we are called from
> > -    * drm_vblank_get() -> drm_vblank_enable() the refcount will be 1 and
> > -    * we must let that one pass through in order to not lose vblank counts
> > -    * during vblank irq off - which would completely defeat the whole
> > -    * point of this routine.
> > -    *
> > -    * Whenever we are called from vblank irq, we have to assume concurrent
> > -    * readers exist or can show up any time during our execution, even if
> > -    * the refcount is currently zero, as vblank irqs are usually only
> > -    * enabled due to the presence of readers, and because when we are 
> > called
> > -    * from vblank irq we can't hold the vbl_lock to protect us from sudden
> > -    * bumps in vblank refcount. Therefore also restrict bumps to +1 when
> > -    * called from vblank irq.
> > -    */
> > -   if ((diff > 1) && (atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) > 1 ||
> > -       (flags & DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ))) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_VBL("clamping vblank bump to 1 on crtc %u: diffr=%u "
> > -                         "refcount %u, vblirq %u\n", pipe, diff,
> > -                         atomic_read(&vblank->refcount),
> > -                         (flags & DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ) != 0);
> > -           diff = 1;
> > -   }
> > -
> >     DRM_DEBUG_VBL("updating vblank count on crtc %u:"
> >                   " current=%u, diff=%u, hw=%u hw_last=%u\n",
> >                   pipe, vblank->count, diff, cur_vblank, vblank->last);
> > @@ -420,6 +359,7 @@ int drm_vblank_init(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned 
> > int num_crtcs)
> >             init_waitqueue_head(&vblank->queue);
> >             setup_timer(&vblank->disable_timer, vblank_disable_fn,
> >                         (unsigned long)vblank);
> > +           seqlock_init(&vblank->seqlock);
> >     }
> >  
> >     DRM_INFO("Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).\n");
> > @@ -991,25 +931,19 @@ u32 drm_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_device *dev, 
> > unsigned int pipe,
> >                           struct timeval *vblanktime)
> >  {
> >     struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];
> > -   int count = DRM_TIMESTAMP_MAXRETRIES;
> > -   u32 cur_vblank;
> > +   u32 vblank_count;
> > +   unsigned int seq;
> >  
> >     if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
> >             return 0;
> >  
> > -   /*
> > -    * Vblank timestamps are read lockless. To ensure consistency the vblank
> > -    * counter is rechecked and ordering is ensured using memory barriers.
> > -    * This works like a seqlock. The write-side barriers are in 
> > store_vblank.
> > -    */
> >     do {
> > -           cur_vblank = vblank->count;
> > -           smp_rmb();
> > -           *vblanktime = vblanktimestamp(dev, pipe, cur_vblank);
> > -           smp_rmb();
> > -   } while (cur_vblank != vblank->count && --count > 0);
> > +           seq = read_seqbegin(&vblank->seqlock);
> > +           vblank_count = vblank->count;
> > +           *vblanktime = vblank->time;
> > +   } while (read_seqretry(&vblank->seqlock, seq));
> >  
> > -   return cur_vblank;
> > +   return vblank_count;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_count_and_time);
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h
> > index 360b2a7..9f33090 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> >  #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/seqlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > @@ -392,11 +393,6 @@ struct drm_master {
> >     void *driver_priv;
> >  };
> >  
> > -/* Size of ringbuffer for vblank timestamps. Just double-buffer
> > - * in initial implementation.
> > - */
> > -#define DRM_VBLANKTIME_RBSIZE 2
> > -
> >  /* Flags and return codes for get_vblank_timestamp() driver function. */
> >  #define DRM_CALLED_FROM_VBLIRQ 1
> >  #define DRM_VBLANKTIME_SCANOUTPOS_METHOD (1 << 0)
> > @@ -725,10 +721,10 @@ struct drm_vblank_crtc {
> >     wait_queue_head_t queue;        /**< VBLANK wait queue */
> >     struct timer_list disable_timer;                /* delayed disable 
> > timer */
> >  
> > -   /* vblank counter, protected by dev->vblank_time_lock for writes */
> > -   u32 count;
> > -   /* vblank timestamps, protected by dev->vblank_time_lock for writes */
> > -   struct timeval time[DRM_VBLANKTIME_RBSIZE];
> > +   seqlock_t seqlock;              /* protects vblank count and time */
> > +
> > +   u32 count;                      /* vblank counter */
> > +   struct timeval time;            /* vblank timestamp */
> >  
> >     atomic_t refcount;              /* number of users of vblank 
> > interruptsper crtc */
> >     u32 last;                       /* protected by dev->vbl_lock, used */
> > -- 
> > 2.4.11
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to