Hi Randy, randyf at sibernet.com wrote: > > If you are interested in the primary Solaris source, you will really > want to looking at: > > https://java.net/projects/solaris-x11/sources/x-s12-clone/show/open-src/kernel
Thanks. This doesn't look like a git repository though. How can I clone it ? >> They are divergent by design :-/ >> Making the Linux headers public and removing the #else path in libdrm's >> drm.h could be the right thing to do. I'll keep thinking about it... > > Removing the #else path will cause Solaris compiles to fail as it > does consume that side of the conditional (though, as we patch this file > and don't use it as is, it would be trivial to add it or any other > Solaris-specific requirements back in). I was only thinking about patching our libdrm package here, not changing the upstream version. > From a Solaris perspective, I don't see how this file can ever -not- > have conditional compile statements or be patched to support Solaris, as > there are sufficient differences requiring at least minor changes. I'd still like to only use the Linux version by default, both in kernel and userland. I guess at this point the only way to do that without breaking Solaris is to either use local patches or change the logic of the #if directives to replace the Linux check with a !Solaris one. >> I'm afraid there won't be many *BSD people around. This year, the XDC and >> EuroBSDCon conferences fall on the same week-end :-( >> I'm not sure which one I will be attending to at this point. > > Not sure yet if I will be attending either. But would happily > provide any input on this either in person (if I am there), or via email. Dri-devel seems to still be the best place for now :) Cheers, -- Francois Tigeot
