On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > robert.foss at collabora.com writes: > >> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com> >> >> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return >> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier >> update pending. >> >> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is: >> >> * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is >> * an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue >> * of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that. >> * Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a >> * synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the >> * commit in that case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com> > > This looks good to me. Let's give it a few days on the list for any > other KMS folks to catch anything. >
I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch. Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
