On 26/04/16 23:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> As the FIFO underflow IRQ handler just prints an error message to the
> kernel log, simplify the code by not registering one IRQ handler per
> plane but print the messages directly from the main IRQ handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h   |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_irq.c   | 49 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 24 ------------------
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

> @@ -233,6 +271,11 @@ int omap_drm_irq_install(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->irq_list);
>  
> +     priv->irq_mask = DISPC_IRQ_GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW
> +                    | DISPC_IRQ_VID1_FIFO_UNDERFLOW
> +                    | DISPC_IRQ_VID2_FIFO_UNDERFLOW
> +                    | DISPC_IRQ_VID3_FIFO_UNDERFLOW;

Not all VID overlays exist on all DSS versions, so we shouldn't register
irqs that don't exist on the HW.

Also, I do like it that we deal with crtc or plane interrupts in
omap_crtc or omap_plane. Would similar approach here work as you use in
the following patches, i.e. just call underflow-handler func in
omap_plane.c directly, instead of using the registration mechanism?

 Tomi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160509/4c11625f/attachment.sig>

Reply via email to