El 09/03/16 a las 13:14, Shuah Khan escribió:
> On 03/09/2016 08:29 AM, Emilio López wrote:
>> One of the tests rely on a behaviour only observed on the driver currently
>> in use in Android. Disable it here until the behaviour is implemented
>> or it is decided it should not be implemented on the driver in mainline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez at collabora.co.uk>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>   tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> index c3e4c01..3f484318 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync_test.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,14 @@ int main(void)
>>      err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_one_timeline_merge);
>>      err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_merge_same_fence);
>>      err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_multi_timeline_wait);
>> +#if 0
>> +    /* The following test has been disabled due to differences
>> +     * between the upstream and Android kernel drivers. The behaviour
>> +     * that should occur when destroying a timeline with active fences
>> +     * has not been defined yet.
>> +     */
>>      err += RUN_TEST(test_fence_wait_on_destroyed_timeline);
>> +#endif
>
> It would be useful to have a real define here that can be
> enabled later easily instead of if 0.

Ok, sounds good.

Thanks!
Emilio

Reply via email to