On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:30:07PM +0200, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> > The current bitwise AND should result in the same assembler
> > but this is what the code is actually supposed to do.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi at math.uni-bielefeld.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com>

Applied to drm-misc, thanks.
-Daniel

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c
> > index b3f3c2c..e4a1a63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_plane.c
> > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ exynos_drm_plane_check_size(const struct 
> > exynos_drm_plane_config *config,
> >         state->v_ratio == (1 << 15))
> >             height_ok = true;
> >  
> > -   if (width_ok & height_ok)
> > +   if (width_ok && height_ok)
> >             return 0;
> >  
> >     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("scaling mode is not supported");
> > -- 
> > 2.7.3
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Reply via email to